Over the past decade, the global green building market has experienced remarkable growth, spurred by a heightened emphasis on corporate sustainability. With projections indicating a market value set to exceed $377 billion by 2026, it’s evident that sustainability has become a paramount concern for business worldwide.

At the forefront of this movement are certifications like BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), widely regarded as benchmarks for environmentally friendly construction practices. However, amidst this surge in green building initiatives, questions loom regarding the efficacy of these certifications in truly reducing carbon emissions and fostering meaningful sustainability.

The popularity of Green building certifications

Green building certifications emerged in the 1990s as a response to the environmental impact of the construction industry, which accounts for 39% of global energy-related carbon emissions. These certifications, epitomised by BREEAM and LEED, were envisioned as tools to help ensure buildings reduce their carbon output. While their impact on carbon emissions remains subject to debate, they have undeniably sparked crucial conversations about sustainability and raised awareness among corporations and stakeholders.

The allure of green certifications lies in their potential to enhance corporate reputations and financial returns. For many companies, obtaining these certificates serves as a badge of eco-friendliness, bolstering their public image and satisfying regulatory requirements without delving deeper into their substantive environmental impact. Additionally, studies have shown that green-certified buildings command higher market values, further incentivising businesses to pursue these credentials. However, this emphasis on optics and financial gains has overshadowed the core mission of reducing carbon emissions, raising doubts about the value of green building certifications.

Challenges and limitations

Despite their widespread adoption, green building certifications face several challenges that undermine their effectiveness. One notable issue is the lack of standardised reporting and independent data on their environmental impact. Additionally, the proliferation of different certification regimes has led to confusion and inconsistency in defining sustainability standards. Variances between leading certifications like BREEAM and LEED further compound this problem, highlighting disparities in evaluation processes and criteria.

Furthermore, the high costs associated with obtaining these certifications create barriers to entry, limiting accessibility and perpetuating inequities within the industry. This financial burden, coupled with administrative complexities, detracts from businesses’ ability to prioritise meaningful sustainability measures over bureaucratic compliance.

Exploring alternative approaches

It is clear that green building certification is an important step towards creating a sustainable future. The construction of green building is a major component of the global shift towards a more eco-friendly lifestyle. However, it is not enough to simply design and construct a green building and achieve a certification. To truly build sustainability and make sure that the environment isn’t compromised in the process, we must look beyond certification and strive for greater efficiency in every aspect of design and construction.

For example, many green certified buildings still rely heavily on fossil fuels for energy efficiency and heating/cooling systems. Although this may be necessary to meet the standards for certification, more could be done to reduce reliance on these non-renewable resources. By making small changes such as replacing traditional light bulbs with LED bulbs and installing renewable energy sources like solar panels, buildings can go beyond basic green certifications and pursue true sustainability.

Furthermore, green certified buildings often don’t consider indoor air quality or water conservation. While it is crucial to focus on external factors such as energy efficiency, it is just as important to focus on internal factors. By implementing measures such as using non-toxic cleaning products or low flow shower heads, buildings can become even more sustainable than those with only a green certification badge.

Amidst mounting scepticism surrounding traditional green building certifications, there is a growing call for alternative approaches to sustainability in the construction sector. One such solution lies in embracing comprehensive business certifications like Planet Mark of B Corp, which integrate broader sustainability criteria and offer a more holistic assessment of companies’ environmental commitments. By shifting focus from individual buildings to overarching business practices, organisations can align sustainability efforts with their core values and strategic objectives.

Moreover, businesses can pursue sustainability through practical, tangible measures such as low-carbon retrofitting and investments in values-aligned maintenance companies. By prioritising internal improvements and operational changes, companies can achieve meaningful carbon reductions without solely relying on third-party certifications.

Redefining sustainability

Looking ahead, it is imperative for businesses to recalibrate their approach to sustainability in workplaces. Rather than viewing green building certifications as the sole arbiter of environmental responsibility, organisations should prioritise holistic strategies that address the root causes of carbon emissions. This includes embracing innovative practices like low-carbon retrofitting, minimise waste and optimise material usage. Through pragmatic, impactful strategies rather than symbolic gestures, organisations can make meaningful contributions to carbon reduction and catalyse positive change in the climate crisis. 

As the urgency of climate change intensifies, the important for sustainable practices in the construction industry to become increasingly widespread.  By transcending the confines of green building certifications and embracing comprehensive approaches to sustainability, businesses can manage their environmental impact and foster a more resilient future. It is also key that stakeholders across the sector collaborate to navigate the complexities of sustainability and chart a course towards a greener built environment for generations to come.

For more information visit OSiT